The Stryker Rejuvenate joint, that has a metal neck piece that can rub against a metal stem causing metallic debris to come
loose, was experiencing corrosion which led to muscle damage, complete implant failure, and often permanent damage.
Victims who do not have much faith in Stryker's recall or plans to remedy this tragic mistake are taking legal action
because of some very clear evidence that Stryker failed to practice due diligence before releasing this product to the market. Once it is proven
that Stryker put company profits ahead of public safety than legal action will be the best means for victims to obtain the justice they deserve.
Patients who have used the Stryker Rejuvenate joint have experienced the effects of corrosion 8 to 14 months after the device
was installed. The corrosion leads to an inflammation that destroys the tissue around the joint which then has to be replaced again. And so
this joint that is supposed to last up to 15 years is failing in its first or second year.
"When Stryker issued its recall the company sent out letters to all physicians who had ordered their faulty joint and
the physicians then sent letters to patients suggesting they call the doctor's office if they are experiencing any problems," says Terry
Cochran, senior partner of Cochran, Foley & Associates, PC. "After looking at the evidence, there is no question in my mind but that
every patient who has this hip joint inside them will develop problems. And many are suffering from a limp that will remain even after the joint
is replaced again."
Thousands of patients have been implanted with the Stryker Rejuvenate joint in recent years and the number of those with
failed implants is mounting as the months pass. Some of the symptoms and problems related to use of the joint include:
Wear and tear of the hip implant
Loosening, breaking or failure of the implant
Premature death of tissues surrounding the joint
Bone deterioration around the implant
Formation of pseudo-tumors
Severe pain and/or swelling at the joint
Other health problems caused by the spread of metal particles in the blood stream
Lynne Foley, senior partner at Cochran, Foley & Associates PC, and a Registered Nurse,
cautions that most of the above symptoms can lead to serious medical issues if left untreated. She urges anyone with a Stryker hip joint to
call their doctor or surgeon immediately and then call an attorney.
Lawyers at Cochran, Foley & Associates have been compiling evidence of Stryker's complicity in this tragic failure
and are conducting an ongoing national case review of lawsuits in progress in the judicial system.
The Stryker implants are different in that they allow surgeons to correct aspects of a patient's anatomy in an attempt
to offer a more personalized fit for each patient. But despite their adjustable design, the Stryker components faced issues almost immediately
after being brought to market. Recipients complained of pain, swelling, reduced mobility, and issues with metal poisoning.
The fact that Stryker implants are individually adapted to each patient's body type complicates any effort to replace
the Stryker joint with another brand. Thus when a different brand is used the Stryker patient will experience an even lengthier recovery timetable
and might never regain the mobility they had with the Stryker joint.
As is the case with most implant failures, Stryker waited a long time after evidence began appearing before recalling its
faulty product. In fact, patients complained of pain, swelling and other symptoms for three years before Stryker recalled its product – a delay
that allowed thousands of more patients to receive an implanted joint that was known to be flawed.
Although the recall was voluntary, the FDA had been listening to complaints from consumers and in response inspecting Stryker's
manufacturing facilities since 2007. Among the problems the FDA found in 2007 (five years before the voluntary recall) were deficiencies in
quality control stages of manufacturing and the presence of diseases causing germs including clusters of a form of Staphylococcus bacteria.
As a result in November 2007 the FDA warned Stryker that if it did not correct these problems the FDA would seize property
at the manufacturing plant, file injunctions, and warn government agencies not to award contracts with Stryker because of the problems discovered.
While the problems the FDA found at the Stryker Plant may or may not be related to the joint failures, the fact remains that Stryker did not
recall the joint until after being warned by the FDA and after thousands of more joints continued to be made.
"What these facts do point to is that patients and family members cannot rely upon Stryker to do the right thing when
its products fail and victims are experiencing great suffering," says Cochran. "In many of our malpractice cases involving faulty medical
hardware, toxic drugs, and bad procedure we find that the guilty party waits months and months before doing the right thing while victims suffer
needlessly. This is intolerable!" "The fact is the victim of a faulty joint placement will not feel good simply because the manufacture
asks for another chance to make it right," says Cochran.
"Having hip replacement is always strenuous to go through, including the weeks of rehab following surgery, but it is
tragic and more grueling when the patient must have the hip replacement redone because of a replacement joint recall," adds Cochran.
About Cochran, Foley & Associates
Cochran, Foley & Associates, PC, is a Michigan law firm with expertise in medical malpractice, product liability, and
catastrophic injuries that does not represent insurance companies or corporations but instead bases its fees upon representing individuals and
families. If you had a Stryker hip replacement call us at 800-322-5543 for a free consultation or visit